Handbook for Atlasing
North American Breeding Birds
Edited by Charles R. Smith, Published September 1990
Atlasing Handbook contents page
Standardized Breeding Criteria Codes:
Recommendations for North American
Breeding Bird Atlas Projects
Sarah B. Laughlin, Janet R. Carroll, and Sally M. Sutcliffe
Vermont, New York, and New Hampshire Atlas Projects
The Working Group on Atlas Codes reached consensus on recommended codes for North
American Atlas projects. For the most part this was relatively simple to agree upon;
however, the MULTIPLE SINGING MALES issue was difficult and incurred some somewhat heated
discussion. It was AGREED that "multiple singing males" is NOT an
acceptable code for CONFIRMATION because it is not a hard, factual, biologically
valid criteria like the other codes. Now that atlas results are becoming legal criteria
for land-use issues and endangered and threatened species lists, it seems especially vital
to keep our criteria above reproach. The same arguments hold true for "multiple
singing males" as PROBABLE. One side argues that if you have seven singing
territorial males on one block-busting trip you should intuitively know that you have a
probable breeding species. The other side argues that if there are indeed that number of
males behaving in a territorial way that you should be able to achieve probable statue
with one of the existing codes, and that it's not worth jeopardizing our data by using
"sloppy" codes. The Working Group finally voted NOT to recommend it as an
acceptable code for PROBABLE either (voting NOT ACCEPTABLE were New Hampshire, New York,
Maryland, Quebec and Virginia; voting YES, ACCEPTABLE were West Virginia and Florida).
Code1 Evidence
OBSERVED:
OSpecies (male or female) observed in
a block during its breeding season, but no evidence of breeding. Not in suitable nesting
habitat. Includes wide range of species such as vultures or raptors, or a colonial nesting
species not at the nesting colony.
POSSIBLE:
Species (male or female) observed in suitable nesting habitat during its breeding
season.
XSinging male present in suitable nesting
habitat during its breeding season.
PROBABLE:
PPair observed in suitable habitat
during its breeding season.
SPermanent territory presumed through song
at same location on at least two occasions 7 days or more apart.
TPermanent territory presumed through
defense of territory (chasing individuals of the same species).
CCourtship behavior or copulation.
NVisiting probable nest-site.
AAgitated behavior or anxiety calls
from adult.
BNest building by wrens or excavation
of holes by woodpeckers.
CONFIRMED:
CNCarrying nesting material, such as
sticks or other material. Please submit full details including location within the block
of the observation.
NBNest building at the actual
nest-site.
PEPhysiological evidence of breeding
(e.g. highly vascularized, edematous incubation [brood] patch or egg in oviduct based on
bird in hand. To be used by experienced bird banders on local birds during the nesting
season).
DDDistraction display or injury
feigning.
UNUsed nests or eggshells found.
Caution: these must be carefully identified, if they are to be accepted.
PYPrecocial young. Flightless young of
precocial species restricted to the natal area by dependence on adults or limited ability.
FLRecently fledged young (either
precocial or altricial) incapable of sustained flight, restricted to natal area by
dependence on adults or limited mobility.
ONOccupied nest: adults entering or
leaving a nest site in circumstances indicating occupied nest. To be used for nests which
are too high (eg the tops of trees) or enclosed (eg chimneys) for the contents to be seen.
CFCarrying food: adult carrying food
for the young.
FYAdult feeding recently fledged
young.
FSAdult carrying fecal sac.
NENest with egg(s).2
NYNest with young seen
or heard.2
Notes:
1. The letter code is entered by the field workers in the appropriate space on the
field report form. Possible and Probable categories are represented by
single letters or a symbol. Confirmed by double letters. Letters have been selected
as a mnemonic aid, keyed to underlined words in criteria definitions.
2. Presence of cowbird eggs or young is confirmation of both cowbird and host species.
General Recommendations
1. The date the code was observed should be recorded on the recording sheet as on the
New Hampshire recording sheets. This is valuable data for timing of breeding activities.
2. A data information booklet on what codes are appropriate for what species within
what dates should be prepared by each state and province, as "safe dates" for
breeding vary with geographic location. The Maritimes have set an excellent standard for
this. Computer proofing programs should be set up to check the entered date against these
criteria.
3. Good training of field workers in the use of the codes cannot be over-emphasized.
Atlasing Handbook contents page
|